LangGraph vs LangChain: Which Framework to Use for LLM Apps in 2025?

Introduction

In 2025, the rise of LLM-powered apps is transforming industries—from AI assistants to smart automation tools. If you’re building an application using GPT-4, Claude, or open-source LLMs, you’ll need a robust framework to handle logic, memory, state, and tool usage. Two of the most discussed frameworks today are LangChain and LangGraph.

This guide compares LangGraph vs LangChain with real-world use cases, pros and cons, and a final recommendation for developers, startups, and AI builders.


What is LangChain?

LangChain is a Python-based framework designed to build applications powered by language models. It abstracts common components like LLM wrappers, memory, chains, and tools to help you get started quickly.

Key Features of LangChain:

  • High-level abstractions for quick LLM app development
  • Plug-and-play integrations with OpenAI, Hugging Face, Google PaLM, etc.
  • Native support for memory, prompt templates, and chains
  • Integration with vector stores (Pinecone, Weaviate, ChromaDB)

Best For:

  • Beginners building simple chatbots or question-answering systems
  • Rapid prototyping
  • RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pipelines

Limitations:

  • Becomes harder to debug as your logic grows
  • Loops and multi-agent logic are non-trivial
  • Tightly coupled components may limit customization

What is LangGraph?

LangGraph is a newer, graph-based orchestration framework created by the LangChain team. It’s designed for multi-agent, stateful, and cyclical applications using LLMs.

Instead of relying on chains or sequences, LangGraph allows you to build a state machine or directed graph, where each node represents a step (agent, tool, memory access), and edges define the transitions.

Key Features of LangGraph:

  • Visual and code-based graph workflows
  • Supports loops, branching, conditional flows
  • Better suited for tool-using agents and complex workflows
  • Explicit state management

Best For:

  • Advanced LLM applications
  • Multi-agent systems
  • Agents that require retries, memory, and conditional decision-making

Limitations:

  • Steeper learning curve for newcomers
  • Manual setup of state and transitions
  • Still a growing ecosystem (fewer tutorials)

LangGraph vs LangChain: Feature Comparison Table


Real-World Use Case: When LangGraph Wins

Use Case: You want to build a travel planner agent that:

  • Reads a user’s destination
  • Fetches real-time weather (via API)
  • Calculates expenses
  • Suggests a 3-day itinerary
  • Can retry tasks if API fails

In LangChain, building this would require juggling chains, callbacks, and memory tracking across steps. Debugging retries would be tough.

With LangGraph, you model this as a graph:

  • Nodes = agents (planner, weather, budget)
  • Edges = transitions (next step, retry loop, error handler)
  • State is passed and updated across the graph

Result: Better clarity, control, and performance.


When to Use Which Framework?

Use LangChain if:

  • You’re a beginner in LLMs or building your first prototype
  • You want to build a chatbot, summarizer, or FAQ bot
  • You don’t need loops or multi-agent logic

Use LangGraph if:

  • You’re building multi-turn, multi-agent, or stateful workflows
  • You need retry logic, conditional transitions, or debuggable state
  • You want a production-ready LLM agent system with full control

Tooling & Ecosystem


Final Thoughts

LangChain is still a fantastic framework for getting started with LLMs. But as your app grows in complexity—with multiple agents, retries, tool integrations, and branching logic—LangGraph is the future. It brings structure, transparency, and state control to your LLM-powered applications.

💡 Pro Tip: Start with LangChain. Graduate to LangGraph when your AI app gets smarter.


Prem Kumar
Prem Kumar
Articles: 19

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *